Throughout the years, CAMH has gone through multiple changes
as a whole. Originally the museum was not actually a museum at all. Although
founded by Walter I. Farmer, Robert Preusser, Alvin Romansky, Karl F. Kamrath,
Edward M. Schiwetz, and Robert D. Straus, throughout the forties it would host
its exhibitions at other museums and buildings in and around Houston; the most
notable being empty galleries at the Houston Museum of Fine Arts. In a
technical sense the museum was really only an organized idea at this point, and
was purely volunteer. Even though it was young, the museums first exhibition, “This
is Contemporary Art” included some of the most famous architects and artists of
the twentieth century, with names such as Frank Lloyd Wright, Charles Eames,
and Vincent Van Gogh. Soon the CAHM started making serious progress and became
more than just a volunteer gallery.
As CAMH continued to grow, a small building was purchased to house the pieces
normally showcased elsewhere, in 1949. This finally gave the museum somewhere
it could call home, but was still just the tip of the iceberg. In addition to
its first building, CAMH, although traditionally strictly non-profit and
volunteer, hired its first employee Jermayne MacAgy. The building itself was
much too small to house the ever growing series of prominent collections, so
the board allocated enough money for a new building to located in Montrose, the
center of the arts district.
The new building was planned and constructed by Gunnar Birkerts and Associates
in 1972. Having Gunnar Birkerts build the museum was quite profound as he was a
member of the American Institute of Architects, and was the recipient of many
different architectural awards. Constructed to be noticed and remembered, the
new building, which is still open today, was made of stainless steel, but oddly
enough had no windows. This is in an attempt to create an environment
that is isolated, yet controlled at the same time. With no natural source of
light, the source, and amount can be manipulated completely, depending on the
will of the exhibitions owner. In addition, the museum never permanently hosts
any body of work in its thirteen thousand square foot expanse. This helps bring
in more people, and at the same time by circulating art, allows Houstonians the
chance to see a unique blend of artwork.
The current museum was renovated by Stern and Buck to help preserve and
stimulate its architectural identity. The new look helped gave the museum a
fresh new appeal. During the renovation, Olin partnership renovated the outside
landscaping. Olin partnership helped bring nature into the design scheme by
using adding trees, and expanding the amount of greenery and water features on
the property.
When it comes to the design of the elevations, the
Contemporary Arts Museum Houston is dominated by a modern appeal. By creating
such a basic design of steel for the outer layer, Birkerts emulated the same
idea behind Mies Van Der Rohe’s “Farnsworth House”, “Less is more”. Mies’ idea
of “less is more” was prevalent through many of his works. Birkerts previous
work was more of a mix of both minimalism and ornamentation. In the Farnsworth
house, the house only contained what it required to in essence be a house, no
more, no less. The stainless steel is timeless, so by picking it, Mies
work is once again exemplified. While the house contains sharp angles, it is
still dominated by one idea, the metal body. In the CAHM, the minimalist
approach ends on the outside, as the transition inside provides a much
different theme. (Phaidon)(FarnsworthHouse).
The museum itself is literally called the “Contemporary”
Arts Museum Houston, and that’s exactly what it contains inside of it,
contemporary art. Since the museum is quite local, and houses contemporary art,
the interior fits the mold for postmodern ideals. By housing many different
types of contemporary art and design the museum creates a culmination of
pluralism to occur. With the different types of art, the museum gains a bit of
an eccentric air, mirroring part of Houston’s city cultural flair. The
postmodern inside blends beautifully with the outside to create a truly one of
a kind composition.
Not to be left out though is the buildings landscape. It too
contains postmodern and modern elements. While the sparse use of trees and
random metal objects add to the postmodern ornamental values of the design, the
use of concrete and water features add to the modern feel. The outside of the
building, mixed together as it is, really exemplifies the work’s values as a
whole. In doing this, the building fits in perfectly with the rest of Houston
at a social level as well. The house, as well as the city, contains a diverse
grab bag of features that make both one of a kind. The design will continue to
be timeless, as well as inspire future generations to blend not necessarily
postmodern and modern values, but to at the very least think outside of the
box.
References
Contemporary Arts Museum Houston. (n.d.). Retrieved February
24, 2015, from
http://houstonmuseumdistrict.org/museums/contemporary-arts-museum-houston/
CONTEMPORARY ARTS MUSEUM. (n.d.). Retrieved February 24,
2015, from http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/klc02
Archive. (n.d.). Retrieved February 24, 2015, from
http://camh.org/exhibitions/archive
No comments:
Post a Comment